September 26
Business logic 101: Companies taking an end-run around the real issues. Nike announced yesterday that it has designed and will sell a shoe designed specifically for american indians. Why, you ask? Is the company attempting, in some small way, to make reparations for all those greedy white capitalists stealing indian land so many decades and centuries ago? Hardly. Nike says all profits from the sale of the shoe (which will be offered to tribes at a "bargain" wholesale price of $42.80) will go toward health programs aimed at combatting the obesity and diabetes epidemics plaguing tribes. While it's nice to see a company making an attempt to reach out into the community, obesity is hardly the single worst problem facing american indians. Sure, physical fitness is important. But so are educational opportunities and programs to fight drug and alcohol abuse. Pledging money to support those causes would go a lot further toward getting american indians back on track than simply offering them an overpriced shoe. More to the point, simply selling the shoes isn't the issue. It's making sure they actually get used, not sold to buy drugs or alcohol. And yes, that may be stereotypical. But that doesn't make it untrue. Just unpleasant. Quite frankly, there are better ways that Nike could invest in the future of american indians. Maybe offering internships or job opportunities to indians, or pledging some percentage of total sales for a year toward programs to help elders or create a drug and alcohol abuse program. But overpriced shoes? That's just a nice PR ploy to buy off a people who've been cast aside by society and the government. Think of them as miniature reservations. With laces.

September 15
Every once in a while, you're listening to the radio or reading the paper, and little news gems just leap out and smack you upside the head. Here are my favorites in the last week:
When truth is stranger than fiction: Emergency room self-check-in. You know the health care industry has reached a new low when it starts taking customer service cues from the airline industry. Allegedly, the little kiosks will save time, since "the long wait in line to register and explain symptoms can be grueling." Because trying to type in your possibly life-threatening condition onto an error-prone computer touch screen while simultaneously bleeding, vomiting, wheezing and fainting will make the process so much less grueling. And so much more sanitary. And I'm sure it'll save the ER nurses from having to suffer through all that pesky personal interaction during check-in. Moreover, the kiosks "should help nurses identify the most urgent cases." Naturally. Because actually looking at and talking to someone suffering from an emergency medical condition has proved so unreliable in the past. Additionally, doctors say, “If it’s getting people to be able to sit down and not be in a long line, then it’s good,” said Dr. Brian Keaton, president of the American College of Emergency Physicians." Right. Because that's the goal when you go to the ER. To whiz through the check-in process so you can sit around the waiting room. Actually getting to see a doctor has apparently never been the point of the ER. Hence the name. It's a room full of people with emergencies. And the pox of automating everything about life will continue to spread. To check yourself in with a sucking chest wound, please enter your name, age and credit card number. Try not to bleed on the touch screen.
Sky gods got your goat? "Officials at Nepal's state-run airline have sacrificed two goats to appease Akash Bhairab, the Hindu sky god, following technical problems with one of its Boeing 757 aircraft, the carrier said." Actual aircraft maintenance is obviously out of the question, here. Why bother with nuts, bolts, wires and wrenches when you can just lop the head off a goat and solve all those bothersome technical problems? And as an added bonus, you've got fresh meat for that in-flight meal service. Mmmm. Goat a la Boeing. Tasty.

August 17
Things I need to get out my system before I brave the endless TSA lines, "security" checks at the airport and other assorted in-flight admonishments, er, announcements:
* Cigar cutters and corkscrews ARE allowed on the flight, but knives are a giant safety hazard. Explain to me how this makes sense. You can't smoke on a flight, nor can you bring your own booze. And how, exactly, is a corkscrew safer than a knife? It's sharp and pointy, and probably does a heck of a lot of damage to soft tissue. Ditto the cigar cutter — which, incidentally, includes a really sharp razor blade. But according to the TSA, these things are much safer than a knife. Well. I certainly feel relieved to know that.
* Cattle prods, axes, hand grenades and dynamite are not allowed in your carry-on luggage (although you can check the first two in your baggage, if you so desire). Seriously? Because I'm totally bummed that I can't bring those souvenir grenades and land mines back from Cuba.
* Gel insoles in shoes. Also not allowed. I guess from a terror standpoint, it makes sense. But there are probably going to be some seriously angst-ridden folks wilting away in the standing-room-only 4-hour security line.
* Overbooking. "We'll give you a $400 voucher for a future flight AND pay for your lodging if you give up your seat..." Here's a thought: I'll give YOU $20 to go back to elementary school and learn how to count again. It's a simple concept, you see. There are a set number of seats on a plane — say 170. So you sell (wait for it...) 170 tickets. This is not rocket science. It's not even science. It's math. And easy math at that. You'd think the airlines would figure this out.
* Preboarding. As George Carlin so beautifully pointed out, you cannot preboard. It is physically impossible to board the plane before you have actually BOARDED the plane. You can board early, but you cannot preboard. Quick. Someone tell the flight attendants.
* Seat belts. "Insert the metal flap into the buckle and pull to tighten." If you haven't figured out how to work a seat belt by now, please return your seat back to its upright and locked position and a flight attendant will come by and smack you upside the head with one of those metal flaps. Honestly. Unless you traveled to the airport by water buffalo, chances are very good that, with a minimum of effort, you can figure out how to fasten your seat belt. Without instructions. Or visual aids.
* Exit rows. "If you are unable or unwilling to assist others, please contact a flight attendant and we will have you moved." Ability is one thing. And it's nice to think that we'd be altrusitic and help everyone else before getting ourselves out. But if we're sinking to the bottom of the ocean faster than the Titanic, I guarantee you the only thing I'm going to be willing to do is get my happy ass out of the plane. The rest of you are on your own. Oh yeah. And the extra leg room is great, too.
* Exiting the plane in the event of an emergency. "Look around you and find your nearest exit. Remember that your nearest exit may be behind you." Frankly, if we're plummeting out of the sky and pieces of the plane are flying off into oblivion, I don't see how finding my nearest exit is going to help me out. Unless there are parachutes by the door. Ditto for water landings (which is a serious misnomer, unless you're fortunate to be on one of those 737s with pontoons). Once we break apart on impact, I'm pretty sure the nearest gaping hole in the fuselage will be nowhere close to my nearest exit.
* Oxygen masks. "If cabin pressure suddenly drops, oxygen masks will appear." Hell, if we depressurize at 30,000 feet, there's probably going to be a lot more "appearing" than oxygen masks. Like Elvis, pink dragons and flying monkeys, too. Right before I pass out. "Place the mask over your face and breathe normally." Right. The way you "normally" would if you're on a plane hurtling toward the ground at speeds approaching 600 miles per hour. Which for me is hyperventilating — although I'm sure the masks do a nifty job of muffling all those screams.
* Assorted announcements from the pilot. You've heard them. "If you look out the windows on left side of the plane, you'll see Mount Rainier." or "Below us, folks, you'll see the majestic Rocky Mountains." That's great, bud. Thanks for the little geography lesson. Shouldn't you be up there flying the plane instead of playing cruise director?
* "Lavatories." They're bathrooms. Stuffing a sink and a toilet into a 2-cubic-foot closet on board an airplane does not give you the right to rename it. Nor does it make the facility more classy.
* Seating. New, redesigned seats brought to you by Torquemada. With extra lumbar support placed conveniently above your shoulders and plush cushions made by folding your inflatable life vest into an origami square approximately 6 inches wide by 7 inches deep. Not comfortable yet? Just recline your seat a luxurious .005 degrees, thereby reducing the legroom of the passenger behind you from 3 inches to 2. Have a nice flight.
* Food. The only thing more nauseating than actually eating the food provided by the airlines is being forced to purchase it because the airlines are too bankrupt to include meals in the already-exorbitant price of your ticket. I'll stick with the "free" drink and .05-ounce package of peanuts, thanks. It's probably the only edible thing on the plane outside of first class.

July 27
More passing the buck, 101: Recent studies confirm that fatness, like laziness, may be contagious. According to a study published recently in the New England Journal of Medicine, if you have a fat friend, you have a more than 50 percent chance of becoming fat yourself. Hence the expression, "monkey see, monkey do." So here's my question: Have we become so fantastically lazy that we've lost all capacity to think and act for ourselves? Personally, if I know that one of my friends is morbidly obese, I'm not gonna think, "Hey, maybe I should eat more so Nicole doesn't feel so hideous." I'm gonna think, "Damn, maybe I ought to renew that gym membership." It's not going to be the failure of our elected officials to keep the world from spiraling downward into civil war and utter chaos that kills us, it'll be a culture that celebrates gluttonous excess and a complete lack of personal responsibility. When in Rome, right?

April 26
When high school students are being arrested for disorderly conduct after writing "disturbing" essays, but producers of movies like "Saw," "Disturbia," "Grindhouse," and "Turistas" are allowed to continue selling horror and torture to a mass audience as though it were an acceptable form of entertainment, there is something sadly, sadly wrong with this world. An Illinois high school student was arrested yesterday for writing an essay that his teacher found disturbing. The student, a senior, apparently had never been in trouble with the law and had gotten straight As throughout high school. See the full story here. Where do we draw the line, though? Certainly no one wants to condone murder, torture or other acts of brutality -- whether in literature, song, theater or film -- but at what point does creative expression directly indicate a predisposition to violence? And who's to say what's disturbing, as opposed to merely questionable? If the thought police are going to begin cracking down on people whose creative expression places them in the same category as murderers and rapists, perhaps they ought to go after the power players in the arts world. Start arresting rappers for promoting domestic violence in their music. Start cracking down on expressions of violence, torture or sadism in all forms of literature. Remove "disturbing" scenes from plays. Prohibit film and TV producers from using horror content as the plot for movies and shows. Hell, if you're going to start treating the citizens of this country like we're nothing more than mindless drones from "1984" or "Brave New World," whose personal thoughts are subject to censorship or punishment, then start applying the double standard to entities whose "disturbing" content reaches the most people. Or take a step back from being Big Brother. We're lucky to have so many freedoms in this country. But those freedoms shouldn't include the authority to arrest and imprison people for artistic expressions that others don't agree with.

March 30
Linguistic anomaly that amuses me: "armed and dangerous" -- most frequently seen in the phrase, "The suspect was armed and dangerous." Which begs the question: Doesn't being armed automatically make you dangerous? Do we even need to add that someone is dangerous if they have a weapon? The first thought that crosses my mind if I know that someone is armed is: "Holy crap! This guys is dangerous!" If I can see that someone is holding a shotgun/AR-15/AK-47/machete/grenade launcher, I don't need someone to remind me that he's armed AND dangerous. I think I can figure that out by myself, thanks. And on another tangent: Can you be armed, but not dangerous? Have you ever heard of someone being armed and apathetic? Armed and sleepy? Armed, not in a dangerous sort of way but in more of an attention-seeking way? Or just simply armed? Linguistic sticklers unite! Demand redundancy reduction! Petition your local news agencies! Preferably while armed and dangerous.

March 10
Reason no. 3,584,477 why U.S. diplomatic relations need a thorough overhaul: Apparently, envoys from the U.S. and Iran met today for a one-day conference designed to heal their 27-year track record of giving each other dirty looks. One day. If you think that two countries with such a deep-seeded history of animosity can solve their massively-spiraling-out-of-control power issues in 24 hours, give me a call. I've got some oceanfront property in Wyoming I'd like to sell you. Sadly, this also vividly illustrates why we're snatching defeat from the jaws of victory in Iraq. Whoever's running the show over there in the other Washington needs to take a crash-course in military and religious history. No amount of firepower, manpower, or thinly-veiled threats of embargoes or lack of aid is going to suddenly sort out thousands of years of social and religious bickering. These people have been killing each other over their differences for millenia. Three-and-a-half years of forced babysitting by a country that can't even solve its own problems at home isn't going to solve anything. In all actuality, it's probably only exacerbated the hatred and violence. At this point, the least we can hope for is some semblance of decorm. One-size-fits-all Democracy for the Middle East is nothing more than the pipe dream of an idiot savant.

Feb. 14
News flash from the U.S. Navy: Apparently devoid of any thoughtful, rational ideas regarding national security, the Navy has decided that Flipper and Zak-the-wonder-SeaLion will be our newest first line of defense. Seriously. I really, really wish I were kidding. How many people had to approve this idea before it came to fruition? I always suspected there was some sort of massive intelligence vaccuum at the top levels of the Navy, but this certainly proves my theory. (For full story, see: This Article) Apparently, if a dolphin spots something suspicious in the water, it can drop a special beacon to alert the Navy. Which brings up the obvious question of what, exactly, a dolphin might consider "suspicious" in the water. I consider a trained dolphin patrolling military bases "suspicious," but hey, what do I know? And I would just LOVE to know how they train the dolphin to notice such absurdities...I foresee serious problems if the Navy SEALS undertake any sort of underwater training mission near the base. Meanwhile, if Zak-the-wonder-SeaLion and his cadre of sea lion cadets find a "rogue swimmer," they carry special cuffs attached to lengths of rope that they clamp around the swimmer's leg. How they do this without taking a swimmer's leg off, I don't know. Nor do I want to. Just the thought of being shackled and taken into custody by a marine mammal with a penchant for swallowing salmon whole is enough to make me want to smack my head into a wall. Repeatedly. I can just see it now: The U.S. Navy, proudly sponsored by SeaWorld. Egads. The next thing you know, they're gonna have Shamu running tactical support for the destroyers. Good god, people. If it sounds like something that should be best left to the special-effects team of a James Bond film, then leave it there.

Jan. 19
Government idiocy, 2007 edition: Granted, I could probably call out the idiocy in our government's foreign policy decisions at least twice a day -- if not more. Fortunately, I have better things to do. (Sadly, our government does not. Go figure.) However, this latest bit of Republican magic-wand-waving BS is making my head hurt.
Item 1: It's a surge, not an escalation. Dear god, did we learn nothing from the Clinton impeachment? Lawyers, bureaucrats, journalists and most of the rest of the American public had a field day discussing what the meaning of "is" is. Bottom line? Pretty much everyone -- except the bureaucrats, of course -- determined that "is" meant precisely what we all thought it meant, not the hooey we were being led to believe. The moral of this anecdote? No matter how many ways you package it, a surge is a surge is a surge. See also: upswing, upsurge and, oh yeah, escalation. If consulting a thesaurus for a more palatable term for escalation is GW's idea of a pulling a fast one, then his Cabinet is even more brain-addled than even I care to imagine.
Item 2: More troops, same game plan. Once again, did we learn nothing from Vietnam? Throwing more people at the same problem with no new game plan is not a winning strategy. It's not even a strategy. How many winning sports teams do you know with hundreds of players and no game plan? This isn't the art of war, it's the mockery of war. Someone fix it. Quick. The U.S. hasn't won anything since 1945. That's a hell of a losing streak.
Item 3: The war in Iraq has not made America vulnerable. Like hell. I'm not knocking our new defense secretary, but seriously, what better way to encourage terrorism on U.S. soil than by publicly proclaming our lack of vulnerability -- at the same time that we're sending thousands of military troops, submarines, aircraft carriers, planes, tanks, missiles, and essentially the bulk of our armed forces overseas. Obviously Robert Gates has a far, far different definition of vulnerable than I do.

Dec. 22
Let's begin by dispensing with the notion that this blog has any shred of Christmas (wait, can we say that?), ahem, "Holiday" spirit. It's not so much that I'm against the idea of the season, I'm just fed-up with the political whining, the religious whining, and the capitalistic orgy of consumer spending that we somehow equate with true generosity. You want to be generous, buy a goat or some chickens for a starving family in the Third World. You can't buy altruism at the Gap. But back to the season's latest obscenities...
Latest American invention of note: "Redcliff: America's Liqueur," which proves yet again that the U.S. is still riding the express bus to déclassé. Packaged in a subtle-yet-sophisticated flask-shaped bottle, this intoxicant du jour embodies all that's wrong with America. Though it's been lauded by the alcohol-addled taste buds of beverage publication Patterson's "spirits editor," it's sales have reportedly, and ironcally, tanked. (Paging GW and Tony Snow: Does this fantasy-meets-reality scenario sound familiar at all?) Bar patrons refuse to buy the stuff, even at a ridicuously cheap $1 per shot. They say it has a noxiously lingering aftertaste. And you can't hide it by mixing it with other spirits. Gee. Does this remind anyone else of U.S. foreign policy? Perhaps this liqueur ought to be named "Capitalist Greed: America's Intoxicant" -- at 80 proof, it might go down a little more smoothly.
Why holiday driving is an extreme sport: 'Tis the season for the country's assorted lunatics to be released from their padded rooms and turned loose on our highways and byways. Meanwhile, nominally sane drivers everywhere bang their heads on their steering wheels in abject misery ... that they can't get their hands on a grenade launcher or other suitable weapon of mass destruction to clear out the morons with whom they're forced to traverse the roads. These motoring lunatics include:
The Blinker Bozo: Can't seem to use his turn signal while merging, but has no problem leaving it blinking over and over and over and over and over as he muddles along directly in front of you.
The Tailgating Twit: Seems to derive great pleasure from hovering only a few inches from your rear bumper, despite the fact that there are no vehicles within 50 miles of either of you.
The Indecisive Imbecile: Obviously has no idea how to read his speedometer or work a gas pedal, since his vehicle will suddenly race ahead at 80, then gradually and mysteriously wind itself down to about 50. Most aggravating when combined with the...
...Left-Lane Lunatic: Who is either saddled with intense control issues or feels a deep and soulful connection to the left lane, and left lane only. This person refuses to budge from the passing lane, despite being honked at, hi-beamed, passed repeatedly on the right, threatened with any number of rude hand gestures and/or peppered with a hail of 9mm rounds and live grenades. Most likely won't even stop for the State Patrol unless he can pull over in the left lane. May even have a clause in his will stating a desire to be buried in the left lane of a major thoroughfare. Like I-5. This person is often also a ...
...Blissfully Ignorant Buffoon: Appears to have never actually woken up. Can be identified by a vehicle's complete lack of taillights, headlights, dash lights and/or correct license tabs. And last but not least:
The Speeding Psychopath: Sees speed limits more as guidelines than actual rules, and often takes pleasure in trying to outrun the cops. Often found driving a beat-up 1990s-vintage Japanese import car with $4K-a-pop rims and a ridiculous-looking fin bolted onto the trunk. May also be sporting a BC license plate. Has no problem passing you at speeds in excess of 100 and can even manage to flip you off as he whizzes by.
Dec. 4
More proof that lawyers can make a mountain out of a proverbial molehill: Lawyers for accused "enemy combatant" and "terrorism operative" Jose Padilla claim that he suffered extended torture during his three-and-a-half year stint in military prison. Granted, our government is not known for its upstanding moral character when it comes to "torture." But then again, any country that has been attacked by terrorists to the degree that the U.S. has is understandably not going to take the warm-and-fuzzy route when it comes to dealing with potential terrorists. However, the liberal application of torture claims by Padilla's lawyers give new meaning to the word ludicrous. Lawyers claim that the blacked-out goggles and noise-cancelling headphones Padilla was forced to wear during one out-of-cell excursion constitute "torture." Are you kidding me? How many people, during the course of long international airline flights, choose to wear light-blocking sleep shades over their eyes and noise cancelling headphones over their ears? Are you telling me that these people (and I'm sure I'm not the only one) are actually commiting a form of self-torture? Must be, according to these lawyers. Moreover, these same lawyers contend that, while in military prison, Padilla was subjected to "loud noises, noxious odors, sleep deprivation, extreme heat and cold, and harsh lights." Seriously? The man is in a MILITARY PRISON. What do they expect, the Hilton? Last time I checked, prisons, especially those of the military variety, were not designed for the physical and mental well-being of prisoners. If they were, they'd be called resorts and would be attended by those of us who didn't do something illegal. Loud noises? Noxious odors? It's a prison, people. A prison. People puke, doors slam. This same stuff happens in the real world, but you don't see the average Joe suing the guy down the block for the "noxious odors" coming from his house, or for the "loud noises" emanating from the muffler of his car. Although, if these lawyers have anything to do with it, people might start doing just that. And extreme heat and cold? Give me a break. I'll repeat this again: It's a PRISON. In South Carolina, no less. They do have extreme temperatures, but they're called SEASONS. You know, summer, winter. Hot, cold. Not a real complicated concept to grasp. Quite frankly, Padilla ought to be thanking his lucky stars he hasn't been blown off the face of the map by a damn hurricane in those three years. And don't even get me started on this whole "harsh light" complaint. Jeezus. Hasn't anyone watched NYPD Blue? Or Law & Order? Of course they're harsh lights. Say it with me, people: It's a PRISON. The Navy's not going to hire the Extreme Makeover: Home Edition crew to come into the prison and give it a "soft light" makeover. They're harsh for a reason. Get over it. And yes, there's more. In a final, smack-yourself-upside-the-head statement, a New York psychiatrist has said that Padilla is "unable to adequately help prepare his legal defense." Yes, that's right. Padilla, a former Chicago gang member, is unable to help out his lawyers. Maybe that's because he's devoted the majority of his life to breaking the law, not studying it. Perhaps they might consider the fact that Padilla may not have been playing with a full deck to begin with. Or that his life as a gang member didn't really instill in him a love of the law, or lawyers. For the love of Christ, people. The reason he's got lawyers is so that THEY can prepare his legal defense. If everyone was adequately able to prepare their own legal defense, lawyers nationwide would be out of work. Quite frankly, I could care less about this whole sordid torture issue. You know what? Any one of us, at any time, could make that claim. Teachers could torture us by forcing us to endure multiple readings of Romeo and Juliet. Or Moby Dick. Or they could torture us by forcing us to run a mile in gym class. When did we become so petulant and whiny as a society that we suddenly felt a need to litigate EVERYTHING? Where did we leave our common sense? You round up a couple shrinks and a lawyer, and you'll more than likely be able to weasel your way out of everything. Robbery, DUI, murder. Terrorism. While I understand that everyone is entitled to civil rights and fair treatment, if the government is able and willing to lock up a known former gang member and suspected terror operative, I'm not going to lose any sleep at night knowing that this guy feels he's been tortured. I say suck it up, shut up, and quit bitchin' unless you've got a valid complaint.

Nov. 29
It's officially almost a week after Thanksgiving, and the glut of consumer spending that is Christmas in America has kicked into high gear. And do you know what that means? A sudden and vexing inundation of Christmas-themed music on every radio station known to man. It's enough to make you want to tear your hair out. It's maddening. Everywhere you go, there it is. Grocery stores. The mall. The farm and feed store. The damn gas station. I'm pretty sure I even heard the faint strains of "Have yourself a merry little Christmas" wafting out of a Mickey-D's. For the love of God, people. Enough. Honestly. Thirty-two days of forced Christmas music should be against the Geneva Convention. There's an easy solution to finding Osama. Just start piping a steady stream of Christmas favorites over thousands of speakers situated all over Afghanistan. The Taliban will probably trip over themselves in a rush to surrender. Hell, it's bad enough that even we the American people are ready to storm the radio stations with torches and pitchforks, demanding that all Chrismas music be unconditionally surrendered, then burned. Instead of inspiring Christmas cheer, it makes me want to smack someone upside the head. There are no Christmas favorites anymore. There are only Christmas un-favorites. I don't want to hear Snoop Dogg rap "Silent Night." I don't want to listen to Britney attempt to sing "Joy to the World." I certainly don't want to be forced to listen to Kenny G's nasal sax recital of "Hark the Herald Angels Sing." And no one wants to suffer through a medley Christmas favorites as performed by any one of a hundred country artists. If "O Holy Night" was intended to be performed with a quintet of steel guitars, two harmonicas and a fiddle, Jesus would have been born in Nashville, not Bethlehem. And don't even get me started on the nominally talented pop singers who attempt to write brand-new Christmas classics. Enough, already. In order to preserve what's left of the sanity of the American public, the FCC need to impose some stiff sanctions on radio stations. Like limiting the broadcasting of Christmas-themed music to the 10 days immediately preceding Christmas. And imposing stiff penalties on any radio station that fails to comply. Like death. Or worse.

Nov. 28
Those of us forced into hibernation by the latest western Washington weather anomaly (sub-freezing temps and feet of snow) have brainstormed to come up with a list of kiddie Christmas toys that didn't quite make the cut at Santa's North Pole workshop. (Tip for meteorologists: Wait til after November to predict that the El Nino effect will bring us a milder winter. Thanks.)
* Plastic Surgery Barbie: Complete with extra silicone breast implants and tiny liposuction tools. Tiny crack pipe and alcohol-dependance counselor not included.
* Drunk Redneck Elmo: Complete with tiny six-pack, carton of cigarettes and real tin "Cowboy Up" belt buckle. Companion set for: Target Shooting Elmo, complete with 12-gauge shotgun, shell bandolier and plaid wool coat.
* Remote Drive-By Lexus: Complete with tiny 20" rims, gangster with MAC-10 and thumpin' sound system. Tiny liquor store mock-up and AA batteries not included.
*EludeTheCops-opoly: Blow red lights, pull illegal U-turns and collect $200 for making the Po crash.
Granted, they're probably not kiddie-friendly, but let's face it: When parents keep spending hundreds and thousands of dollars on expensive video game systems and homicidal, violent, lawbreaking-inducing video games -- then complain that it must be the school systems that fail to keep their kids on the straight-and-narrow, they might as well be buying these aforementioned goodies.

Oct. 20
The resounding 'thwack' you heard earlier in the day was the sound of several hundred thousand Seattleites simultaneously dropping their lattes and burying their heads in their hands as they watched the city's convention and visitor's bureau unveil the new city slogan: Metronatural. Say WA? We were fortunate that the state's previous headache-inducing slogan died a quiet death after several weeks of intense public ridicule. It was obviously too much to hope that the tourism folks learned from this foible. Thus, one of the most educated cities in the nation is saddled with an illogical moniker that appears to be some twisted verbal byproduct of hippie culture-meets-Hollywood tabloid. Even more alarming than the slogan itself is the fact that, and I quote here from an Associated Press story: “Metronatural” is the result of a 16-month, $200,000 effort by Seattle’s Convention and Visitors Bureau... Not only is this new slogan an even more embarrassing mockery of the English language than its predecessor, the city actually PAID a company nearly a quarter of a million dollars to create a new, nonsensical word. And somewhere, Noah Webster is once again writhing in agony in his grave. If this trend of embarrassing sloganism continues, we may have no choice but to admit defeat. I suggest: "Washington: We give up."

Sept. 28
Two new signs of the apocalypse:
Sign number one: Martha Stewart has said she'd like to have white-boy rapper Eminem as a guest on her weekly "how to make food you've never heard of from scratch" cooking show. Her reason? Apparently her audience -- which I can only assume is comprised solely of the high-class folks with whom she was incarcerated for several months -- loves to hear Eminem's "music" during commercial breaks. As for how Mr. Detroit might influence Martha's culinary selections, I can only hazard a guess: "Fried Chicken: The other white meat" and "Gin and Juice: Libations for getting crunk."
Sign number two: A new poll today shows that GW's job approval rating has risen (yes, risen) to an earth-shattering 44 percent, bolstered in part by Republicans, Catholics, Wal-Mart shoppers and men. And no, I'm not making that last part up. The Republicans are just blindly following their party's lead. The Catholics, I can only assume, are acting on some sort of guilt complex. The Wally-World shoppers are thankful that Bush has preserved the time-honored tradition of capitalism by ensuring that starving 6-year-olds worldwide have steady, 5-cent-per-hour employment making clothes for materialistic Americans. And the men...well, let's just say we know what head they're thinking with. The notion of absoloute power must really give them a hard-on.

Sept. 21
No part of society, save politics, has a more flamboyant history of finger-pointing and public temper-tantrums than professional sports. Most recent case in point: The New York Giants' publicity-garnering snit-fit over the noise level in Qwest field last November. You'll remember that the Giants lost that game in overtime after missing an NFL-record 3,000 fieldgoals. Okay, so maybe I'm exaggerating. But I'm guessing it felt that way to the Giants. I'll admit, losing in overtime to a team that, for the better part of two decades, had a history of self-destructing by mid-third-quarter has got to smart a little. But claiming WELL after the fact -- nearly 10 months to be exact -- that the Sehawks illegally used "artificial noise" to intentionally cause you to make false starts and lose the game is a childish tactic at best. Maybe it's repressed anger over the fact that Giants' fans have never caused their opponents to make 11 false starts. Maybe it's the Giants' publicity folks trying to stir up latent anger within the team so that they win Sunday's game. Whatever the case, it's done little to stop Seahawks fans. If anything, it's likely convinced them to be even louder come Sunday. The NFL claims to be taking the Giants' accusations seriously, and will probably monitor the noise level at Qwest field. My suggestion. Bring earplugs. And a white flag. As for the Giants? I say: Suck it up. This is the National Football League. Not the Pop Warner league. If you can't handle the noise, get off the field. And leave the whining to the real babies.

Sept. 15
Regular updating notwithstanding, I realized I have old columns at my disposal that many of you have never read. Unless of course you were a regular reader of the Lynden Tribune. (Yeah. I thought so.) So while I'm waiting for another brilliant insight, take a gander at one of my past moments of literary genius: A healthy dose of erudition for the masses

I've come to the demoralizing conclusion in this new millenium that intelligent vocabulary and competent communication skills are dead.To put it more bluntly, for the apparent sixth-grade reading audience to whom I write (and yes, we should all still try to avoid ending our sencences with prepositions), our disregard for written and spoken language makes us sound like morons. Cretins, even. See also: blithering idiot, ignoramus, dolt.
For those of you out there who don't recognize these words, get thee to a dictionary -- immediately.I've heard many people say that vocabulary and communication (and even grammar) just aren't as important these days.
To those people, I say: I think you're, like, just totally not seeing the, um, you know, problem we're all, like, facing if we don't, you know, get a clue. Take, for example, an article I read in the local paper recently. In no way have our linguistic inadequacies manifested themselves more blatantly than in the name for the proposed farmer's market building in Bellingham: Depot Market Square. What, exactly, is a 'depot market?' is it a market for depots? A depot for markets? Is this similar to saying a 'bus station stop?' Or a 'boat pier dock?' And how did this name even get approved? Are our civic and governmental professionals so linguistically inept that they failed to recognize how ridiculous this name is? And when he isn't scriped by his speechwriters, even our President is guilty of mutilating the English languge -- creating new words like misunderestimated or subliminable.
So tell me again how useless vocabulary and communication are. Tell me again that grammar just isn't important these days. Tell me that you don't use these things in you're daily life. Tell me that their aren't a necessity for students these days to be as focused on communication. And tell me how many of you noticed the errors in each of the previous sentences.
If you didn't notice any, perhaps it's time you went back to elementary school, or middle school even. Weren't we all supposed to learn the difference between plurals, possessives, adverbs and prober verb tense.
And speaking of going back to school, let's talk about reading levels. In my college journalism courses, I was taught to tailor my writing to the average newspaper audience -- most of whom read at a sixth-grade reading level. I, for one, refuse to write at a sixth-grade level when I know that my writing is being read by many people who have completed at least twelve years of school, if not more. If you don't like my writing style or my vocabulary, fine. If you don't understand my writing or my vocabulary, get help. Get a dictionary, or a thesaurus, or a grammar guide. Read some real literature -- Dickens, Thoreau, Camus -- not some tawdry novel for sale in the grocery store checkout line.
I understand that not everyone is an English major, and that not everyone likes to read or write. But I also understand that as functional members of society and professional members of the working world, we are all expected to communicate in a fashion commensurate with our levels of education. No one wants to hear a pulitzer-prize winning author make a speech fraught with "likes," "ums" and "you knows." That sort of language from someone ostensibly intellectual just doesn't sound right, does it?
No matter who you are or what your level of education is, don't undermine yourselves by ignoring the importance of good communication. Go buy a dictionary. Go visit an English teacher. Just don't take your languge for granted.

Sept. 6
Brilliant parenting in action: A father, angered over a late hit on his son during a youth football game in California (where else), charged the field and assaulted the young player who had hit his son. I can just see the explanation here: "Son, it's bad sportsmanship for someone to tackle you after the play is over. However, it's perfectly justifiable for me to charge onto the field and beat the piss out of a defenseless pre-pubescent teen who I outweigh by at least 100 pounds." I hope we've all learned a valuable lesson here: Excessive bouts of parental rage should be saved for the drive home and released through the use of expletive-laden language, not through testosterone-fueled attacks on small children. Wouldn't want to set a bad example, now would we?

June 26
I've been convinced for some time now that oil and petroleum companies either a) brainwash their employees; or b) hire people with the most easily manipulated minds on the planet. Now we have conclusive proof:
""Fundamentally, we don't think carbon dioxide is a pollutant, and so we don't think these attempts are a good idea," said John Felmy, chief economist of the American Petroleum Institute, a trade group representing oil and gas producers."
Felmy is referring here to the government's upcoming decision on whether or not to federally mandate restrictions on pollutants. But wait! News flash! Carbon dioxide isn't a pollutant! Never has been! There's no need to control it! All those environmentalists and PhDs who have studied climate change due based on increased industrial emissions of carbon dioxide over the past 50, 80, 100 years are wrong! So what if US companies expel millions upon millions of litres/gallons of carbon dioxide per day? So what if carbon dioxide gas gets trapped beneath our atmosphere and causes the earth to heat up to its hottest level in more than 400 years? Not to worry, it's not a pollutant! If this is the kind of logic demonstrated by the heads of major corporations -- not to mention by the various elected officials currently in office -- then our future is even more tenuous than I previously suspected. Ignorance may be bliss, but it's no way to run a country.

May 26

Great news from the scientific front: rather than focusing attention on developing vaccines for the latest plague to end all plagues (that would be the avian flu, for those of you who can't read or don't own a TV), scientists today heralded their latest success -- the artificial penis. Yes, the artificial penis. I kid you not. No longer will impotence be seen as god's way of suggesting that we lay off the procreating. Instead, it will be a cry for help...a cry for "a graft of specially engineered penile tissue" to help men "regrow" a functioning third leg. (For the weblink, click here: http://health.msn.com/centers/mensexualhealth/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=100136192&GT1=8165) Ouch. So guys, I have a question for you. I know y'all are pretty fond of the one-eyed monster down there. If your little buddy isn't functioning as described in the instruction manual, are you really going to let some wacked out researcher use scalpels and needles to attach a skin graft to your dick? And then wait for it to "regrow" itself?

Meanwhile in other news: Does anyone else find it amusing that Kentucky Derby winner Barbaro is receiving more attention (read: cards, gifts, monetary donations) after breaking his hind leg in the Preakness than VP Cheney did after his heart attack?

April 27

Passing the Buck 101: Anyone looking for a lesson on how to coast through life while taking no responsibility for any of his or her own actions should pay close attention to the controversy surrounding video games. Granted it hasn't hit full fever pitch yet, but now the federal government is beginning to stick its proverbial nose into the mess. Officals are crying foul over the fact that video game ratings and warnings on packaging don't include all the potential scenes of violence or offensive content the games include. Of course, no one's bothered to point out that the movie rating system doesn't include all the offensive material we might see either, but who am I to interject common sense into the fray. Nevertheless, I digress. I really don't care whether Microsoft annotates its video game packaging in such detail that XBox game cases begin to look like the Seattle Metro phone book. Really. I don't care. What bothers me is that people are blaming the video game industry for the rise in gun violence among teens and pre-teens. Granted, more kids are playing violent video games these days. But who, exactly, is buying these expensive video game consoles and $50-a-pop games for these kids? Because I'll be damned if I can remember a time when my per-week allowance was enough for me to afford a $50+ game. If Mommy and Daddy can afford to go out and blow upwards of $300 on a video game set up, and can be bribed into buying their kids games with titles like "Grand Theft Auto" or "HitMan", then who's really to blame here? Not the video game industry. Certainly not. Blame the parents. Blame the parents for not taking the time to educate their children that there is a distinct line between fantasy and reality. Blame the parents for not teaching their children about responsibility and accountability. Blame the parents for not instilling enough common sense and common courtesy into their children. Blame the parents for blaming the video game industry. The more often children see adults -- their role models -- passing the buck, the less likely these kids will take responsibility for their own actions. Nothing will ever be their own fault. It's happening already, and it's utterly frightening that we continue allowing people to constantly pawn off their own responsibility on someone else. How many of us are sick of hearing that Joe Schmoe decided to take a gun to his high school because of a video game? How many of us are sick of hearing parents say "Well, it's the video game industry that's to blame for our kids being violent." Bullshit. Joe Schmoe decided to take a gun to school because a parent or guardian didn't educate him about gun safety, didn't explain to him that there are better (and more responsible) ways of settling differences of opinion, and didn't show him how to be accountable for his own actions. And the parents are blaming the video game industry to cover up for their own shortcomings. So here's a thought: If you don't want your kids playing violent video games, don't buy them. And don't allow your kids to, either. Simple as that. And if your kid still decides to go out and shoot up his elementary school -- well then you might want to rethink those parenting skills.

Mar. 21

Government idocy, part 3,672,957: The state of Mississippi, always at the forefront of progressive thinking in our country, has outlawed the sale of ... how do I put this nicely ... sex toys. Yes, you heard me correctly. Sex toys. This is the same state that has made extramarital sex illegal. No sex, no sex toys ... next thing you know they'll be banning sex-for-pleasure altogether. I'm surprised there isn't a restriction on the time of day or number of times per week men are allowed to masturbate. This is also the same state that boasts the most lax gun control laws in the nation. Anyone else foreseeing the same problem I am? Forget crazed postal workers. Now we're going to be faced with crazed sex-deprived maniacs with a small arsenal of weapons storming state courthouses demanding their right to purchase and own battery-operated plastic models of male genitalia. Or life-like inflatable female companions. I can just imagine the jailhouse conversations:

"What were you arrested for, Mary?"

"Intent to distribute a vibrator."

"No shit! They got me for posession of a blow-up doll."

"Yeah, I heard Hank got picked up for possessing a four-inch rubber cock AND a Costco pack of batteries"

Please. Please tell me that the people of Mississippi have solved all their drug problems, their gang problems, their low-income-housing issues, their health care disputees, and their road complaints. Please tell me that no one in the state of Mississippi ever breaks a traffic law, curses in public, commits an act of domestic violence or steals clothing from a department store. Please tell me that the only reason the state decided to pass this unbelievably ludicrious law was that it literally didn't have anything better to do. No crime. No social ills. No deviancy of any sort. Please. Instead of manipulating the law as a way to set moral standards, why not focus on the real issues. Like education. Health care. Drug- and gang- related violence. But then again, that would make sense. And as we all know, common sense has no place in government activities.

Mar. 16
Things you don't hear everyday: After receiving a call about a man trying to kick down a door in a low-income neighborhood, police found the suspect passed out near the house ... laying on a sweatshirt containing stolen socks and meat. Socks. And meat. Steak, to be specific. Proving once again that truth is, in fact, stranger than fiction. I guess everyone is entitled to have a need for tube socks and meat. Although not necessarily at the same time.


Things that come to mind while driving home after working all day for a narcissitic, ADD-prone boss: Gee. A beer truck. I wonder how hard it would be to hijack the truck. And drink all the beer. God. I need a beer. Or wine. Or some sort of alcohol. Maybe we should install a beer fridge at work. Or a wall of beer taps. Damn. It's getting off the freeway. Oh well. Almost home. Does anyone know how to drive in this state? Nope. Must just be me. No. Wait. They're all Canadian. That explains everything.

Mar. 10

Government decisions that go against common sense: Washington state edition. Granted, most governmental decisions are not what would be termed reasonable. Few things are, these days. However, a recent Seattle Times article made me stop to consider, yet again, how idiotic some of our elected officials can be. (Bear in mind, that we're the idiots who elected these folks).

Bill would make 5th DUI a felony

Seattle Times staff reporter

OLYMPIA — Driving under the influence is a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail — no matter how many times you've been convicted of the crime before. On Tuesday, the state House unanimously passed a bill that would send people convicted of five DUIs within seven years to prison.

House Bill 3317 now moves to the Senate for consideration.

"Prosecutors tell us that repeat drunk drivers are getting off too easy," said Rep. John Ahern, R-Spokane, who sponsored the bill.

Under the bill, a fifth DUI would be a felony, usually punishable by a minimum of 15 months in prison, Ahern said.

Understandably, it's amazing that our state law has allowed repeat DUI offenders to get away with their crimes over and over and over and over and over again. But this new law definitely stretches the boundaries of sense. One DUI could be seen as a mistake. Two, a sign of a problem. Three, good cause to revoke a license and send someone to alcohol awareness courses or treatment. But four and five? Now we're going to give people five chances to drive drunk, and only THEN make it a felony? Are you fucking kidding me? How many people does a drunk driver endanger when they drive drunk just ONE time, let alone FIVE SEPARATE TIMES? We have stiffer penalties for domestic violence than we do for impaired driving. This is absoloutely idiotic. Imagine if our state had tried to pass a "five strikes, you're out" law, instead of the current "three strikes, you're out" version. There would have been an overwhelming public outcry. And even now, our state reps sponsoring the bill are promoting it because they say current DUI offenders are "getting off too easy." Please. Because getting FIVE chances to avoid jail time is just such an intimidating thought. If you're sober, that is.

Feb. 20

Watching the Olympics over the last week has led me to two conclusions: First, NBC is proving remarkably adept at driving its ratings so far into the ground that there's no chance of them ever seeing light again. This fact is made more impressive when you consider that, well, it's the Olympics. Even people who don't own TVs somehow tune in for the Olympics. At least, they did. If they're smart, they're all watching the coverage on CBC. The Canadians, showing more common sense than their neighbors to the south, are actually broadcasting REAL, CONTINUOUS COVERAGE of the games. Viewers can actually watch 10 to 15 minutes of coverage without commercial or commentator-interruptus. NBC, on the other hand, shows a 3-minute edited clip of four American athletes competing, covers one token international athlete competing, breaks for 6 minutes of commercials, then returns with a 15-minute, heavily music-laden feature on an American Olympic athlete you've never heard of in your life. Last night, they devoted more time to the figure skating WARM-UPs than they did to actual coverage of the 2-man bobsledding.

Watching this Olympic "coverage" with some friends, we began to devise ideas for making the games more compelling for NBC and its viewers. First, the sport of curling is far too safe. Flat ice, no distractions, not interesting. Now, if the curlers were to don speedskates, and the curling were to take place on the luge/skeleton/bobsled track, then we might have something. There would be nothing more fascinating than watching two broom-wielding skaters zip down a frozen tube chasing a 5-pound rock travelling at more than 60mph. Now that's a sport. I'd tune in for that.

And cross-country skiing: boring to compete in, boring to watch. Now, if they'd make the sport full-contact.... Allow the skiiers to use those long poles for more than just impulsion. Imagine two Norweigian guys crouched down head-to-rear as they glide down a hill....and then out of nowhere, a Swedish guy skis up, jams his ski pole between the Norweigian's legs and trips him. The second Norweigian speeds up behind the Swedish guy and jabs him in the rear with a pole, causing the Swede to lose his balance and eventually ski (at slow speed) into a tree. As they ski toward the finish line, skiiers could relentlessly whack at each other with their poles, much like jockeys at the Kentucky Derby. You've got to admit, it would definitely make things more exciting.

And what about luge? Sure, it's exciting already, but imagine luge pursuit. Start one sledder 5 seconds after the first and see if they can catch up to each other. How about freestyle ski jumping, where the skiers are required to do at least one layout with a full twist before hitting the ground? Practical? Probably not. But let's face it. NBC needs help.

 

Jan. 23
Among the myriad linguistic anomalies that piss me off is the use of the word "predeceased" in newspaper obituaries. I swear to god, if I see this word used one more time, heads will roll. 'Predeceased' is not a word. It never has been and I hope to all that is right and holy in this world that it never will be. Why, you ask? It seems to make perfect sense. "Pre" is one of those prefixes that precedes lots of words in our language (like, for example, the words in this sentence.) HOWEVER...the great linguistic minds that apparently work at funeral homes have failed to realize that "pre" (which, for those of you who have never seen a dictionary in your lives, means "before") can't actually apply to events that have already happened, or are currently happening. It raises those whole space-time-continuum issues. Pre (before) deceased (died) How in hell do you die before you die? Do you get a memo? Does some great heavenly voice from inside your vodka bottle gently whisper in your ear that you're about to have a permanent hangover? I'm not sure what scares me more: the fact that some idiot on an embalming-fluid high came up with the word, or the fact that the general public -- which claims to be SOOO well-educated -- fails to see the practical linguistic failures of the word. Someone send help to these people. Or a dictionary. Or just clout them with a two-by-four to the head and ask them if they pre-excpected that to happen.

Jan. 12
Well, it's been a while. And yet, the idiocy continues. This time, we're moving on to sports. The Green Bay Packers, who completed a dismal 4-and-12 season this year, announced the firing head coach Mike Sherman on Jan. 2. And today, the team announced that his replacement would be San Francisco 49ers offensive coordinator Mike McCarthy. Brillant, guys. Maybe the cheese on your heads was a little tight. What better way to improve your chances for the 2006 season than by hiring the offensive coordinator from a team with a record equally as pathetic as your own. If the offense isn't working, your team isn't winning. Simple as that. So naturally, the Packers hire an offensive coordinator who has demonstrated the same skill in his field as Custer did at his last stand. First Brett Favre, now this? Please. Say buh-bye to that waiting list for Packers season tickets. If the team plays as badly next year as it did this year, they're gonna have to start paying people to attend.

Dec. 14
The idiocy strikes again — this time from two sides: the über-liberal, fad-charged-politics of our celebrities, and from the religious Republican right wing. On the left, we have celebrities everywhere bemoaning the fate of America. Our country is destined to plunge into the clutches of hell now that California decided to execute Stanley Williams — founder of the Crips gang and convicted murderer of four people in 1979, who, despite writing books encouraging a gang-free lifestyle, still refused to apologize or express remorse for his actions. I'm sorry. What, exactly, is the debate here? Kill someone, get caught, get tried, get convicted, get sentenced, get the death penalty. That's the judicial system, and it seems to have worked properly. Personally, I'm a little less concerned over our country's death penalty policies and a little more concerned over the fact that our liberal lefties think that anyone who writes a children's book is automatically a saint. Next thing we know, Gary Ridgway is going be elevated to the position of role model. I shudder at the thought. Someone needs to insert a little bit of backbone into the left side of our country.
And then there's the god-promoting right, raising holy hell over the fact that Christmas has been sanitized and purged of any religious implications. As if it's only been a problem recently. Give me a break. Christmas has been a purely commercial endeavor for the past century now. You think any holiday would be this big if it weren't for companies like Hallmark and Coca-Cola? Religion vacated the premises long ago. Today, in most of society, Christmas stands for presents, candy, cards, cookies, trees, holly, mistletoe and twinkle lights — none of which have a whole lot of religious implication. So bring back Christmas sales, Christmas cards, Christmas music, Christmas trees and any other Christmas-y crap you can think of. And if you want a real sense of Christmas, go to church. Stop complaining about the fact that Christmas isn't mainstream culture anymore. You've got your Christmas sanctuary, so make the most of it. Besides, this country was based on freedom from religious persecution, not freedom to persecute people because they aren't religious.

Dec. 2
More idiocy from our elected government (not that it's a surprise anymore): The TSA, properly known as the Transportation Security Administration, can now no longer be called the "Takes Scissors Away" agency. Yes, you heard right. The brilliant minds that make up the head of this federal-tax-dollar-spending monstrosity decided recently that small scissors, nail clippers, nail files, pliers and screwdrivers WILL be allowed back on planes departing from the good ol' USA. While most sane, normal travelers heave a collected sigh of relief knowing that they don't have to ferret through their carry-on luggage for potentially lethal manicure implements, the federal air marshals (those would be the guys with the guns), pilots and flight attendants are in a state of nervous panic. MSNBC quoted an anonymous air marshal as saying “These items [the TSA] are now allowing back in the hands of passengers are nothing less than lethal weapons." I kid you not. This guy has a gun, knows how to use it, is allowed to use it on occasion, and he's panicking about some nutcase with pair of nail clippers. Or for that case, a normal person with a pair of nail clippers. I seriously hope that if there's a crazy guy with a nail file terrorizing a plane full of people, a federal air marshal WITH A GUN would stand a pretty good chance of "disarming" the guy. So to speak. And if the TSA guys are going to start frothing at the mouth over nail files, they ought to start raising hell about the flight attendants allowing passengers to have blankets. And pillows. And plastic forks. I'm sure these things, in the hands of suitably determined passengers, could be turned into "lethal weapons". But you don't see anyone denying passengers these luxuries. And what about a guy who's completely weaponless and tries to strangle someone to death? Couldn't the airline food be considered a "lethal weapon"? When will the idiocy cease?

Nov. 21
"We use lawful capabilities to collect vital information and we do it in a variety of unique and innovative ways, all of which are legal and none of which are torture." So says Porter Goss, head of the CIA, regarding those persistent little rumors that his agency tortures the people they ever-so-sneakily smuggle out of foreign countries. And thus, the doublespeak of rationalization begins. Personally, I don't care whether our country tortues people or not. Sure, it's probably not moral, but neither is blowing up a building full of people. If the torture of one person is what it takes to save the lives of countless others, I say go for it. I'm pretty sure David Hume, Jeremy Benthan and John Stuart Mill would back me up on this, being the utilitarian philosophers they are. But torture or no torture, there's no pleasing the American people. Such is the blessing and curse of free press and free speech. Nevertheless, torture or not, if our country is going to actually come away from this administrative political nightmare relatively unscathed (if that's even possible at this point) someone out there is going to have to actually TALK to the people. None of this "unique and innovative" crap. No hazily positive "legal" information collecting. What is it that you do? If it's torture, own up to it. If it's not torture, at least give us a half-decent idea of what "innovative" methods are used -- bearing in mind that whole protection of national security thing. The country is likely so jaded by political scandal and coverups by now that it would welcome the truth. Or even part of the truth. But then again, if our government suddenly developed some shred of decency, who knows what kind of political fallout we wouldn't have to deal with....

Nov. 11
Yesterday, what with the advent of the heated bra and all, I thought I'd heard everything. But apparently not. Apparently when the holiday over-spending season rolls around, the gadget-makers of the world increase their intake of illegal amphetamines and, accordingly, create products that would even look absurd and out of place to James Bond.
Allow me to explain. Driving, in this day and age, isn't so much about actually piloting a vehicle as it is about turning a car into a mini-office: PDAs, cell phones, GPS devices, portable computers — you name it, most business people have it in their cars. And not only that, they're generally using at least two of these products at a time while also trying to steer, drink coffee and make rude gestures at the person they're tailgating.
But now, there seems to be a trend toward turning cars and trucks into mini-kitchens. As if we needed any more distractions. Thanks to the Seattle Times and Google, I've been made aware that these new, distraction-inducing products are now on the market: A portable car fridge, great for those college kids making a late-night beer run; a cigarette-lighter adapted car oven (yes, oven) just in case you suddenly get a craving for pizza on the way home; the Burton Pot Popper — a crock-pot-like device that allows you to pop corn and make a lovely stew all while driving; and the Stove-to-Go. Try explaining any one of these things to the tow-truck driver who pulls your sorry butt out of the ditch and the state patrol trooper who's writing you a hefty ticket for being an idiot. "You see, officer, I was just about to take my pizza out of the oven when I burned my hand and inadvertantly jerked the wheel to the right...." MmHmm. Sure. And sadly, I don't think there's any statute in the state law that forbids cooking while driving. Not that there shouldn't be, mind you. Perhaps this: "RCW 46.200.01: Illegal baking of pizza while driving. RCW 46.200.02: Illegal popping of corn while operating a motor vehicle." Well, you get the idea.
And just in case you think I'm kidding: Seattle Times-Eat and Drive
The portable oven with link to Pot Popper

Nov. 10
Oh my god, now I've heard everything. A Japanese lingere-maker has developed a heated bra for winter. And matching shorts. Based on the photo, it appears that the bra is not only heated, but furry (of course!). Removable pads in the bra can be heated via microwave or in hot water for a truly warm-and-fuzzy feeling. Is anyone else thinking that perhaps these people have conumed a wee bit too much sake? And if you think I'm kidding, check out the photo: here

Nov. 9
Our tax dollars put to waste: The Kaiser Family Foundation, based in Menlo Park, California, just put out a study detailing the rise in sex-based content on TV. I only have one question (other than to ask where the heck Menlo Park, California is...): Did we really need a study to prove this? Schools are beginning to teach sex-ed to younger and younger grades, kids' clothes are beginning to make Mariah Carey's outfits look almost prudish, and discussions of carnal topics are becoming more and more mainstream. It's no surprise that sex is so prevalent on TV. Shit, sex sells. That's been a widely known fact since the free-love days of the 60s and 70s. But apparently, that knowledge isn't enough, so the Kaiser folks decided to do a study to prove it to us. That's one of the problems with our country: too many studies, not enough action.

October 21
Idiocy in action: In Kamloops, B.C., during a hunting trip, a father was shot in the back by his 6-year-old son wielding a .22 rifle. Where do I begin here? That statement in itself should be cause for some serious head-slapping within the immediate family. Unfortunately, and this only makes it worse, the family issued a statment saying that the son had been exposed to rifles since he was 2, and was familiar with how to handle a rifle safely. Let me clarify something for you, folks. The kid is SIX YEARS OLD! Six! There's a reason firearm safety is not a topic included in the kindergarten curriculum. Six-year-old kids are barely able to read, let alone properly handle firearms. Four years of experience doesn't cut it, in my book. At two, most kids are just learning how to pee in a toilet. And that's usually as much as their barely-developed mind is able to grasp at that point in their life. You're not going to convince me that a kid who still thinks glue is a dietary staple is mentally competent enough to be anywhere near guns. I'm not even going to start with how ludicrous it is to take a 6-year-old on a hunting trip. Most people don't even take dogs that young on hunting trips. I forsee a Darwin Award in this family's future.

October 18
Someone in professional sports finally removed his head from his ass and made what may be the first common-sense decision in history. (For those of you out there scratching your heads, $2.7 million-per-game salary decisions do not make sense -- unless you are the player on the receiving end of this orgy of money-giving.) The NBA on Monday announced a new player dress code. Yes. A dress code. And surprisingly enough, it's a dress code that does not include oversized jerseys, track pants and hubcap-sized bling. Somewhere, P. Diddy and Eminem are wringing their hands over who will buy and gratuitously advertise their overpriced attempts at fashion. Beginning Nov. 1, at the beginning of the season, players will be required to adhere to a minimum dress code of business casual for league and team activities, promotional appearances, and arrival to and departure from games. That means no oversized shorts and tanktops, no profanity-laced Tshirts, no gold chains piled six deep on a player's neck, no indoor sunglass-wearing (those lights aren't that bright, even if you are hung-over), and no earmuff-sized headphones. Finally. Granted, it's a bit ridiculous that it took the NBA this long to pass a rule that requires their professionals to dress just as professionally as the rest of us in the "real" world, but I think it's been worth the wait. Hopefully the developing generation of whiny, petulant children will actually be able to take a cue from professional athletes -- at least in terms of style. Maybe the next rule the league passes will enforce a code of professional behaviour, so that players' attitudes will match their appearance. We can only hope...

October 10
Thoughts for the day:
What is it about rain that seems to bring out the worst in Washington drivers? And I don't just mean the stragglers from the east side of the state who think of rain as something that happens once every six months. I mean born-and-bred west-siders who think of fall, winter and spring as "the rainy season." Every time the skies start sputtering forth with their watery emissions, drivers are wont to slam on their brakes, hunch forward in their seats and peer frantically out the windshield, hoping against hope that they'll be able to stop at their espresso stands safely. It's as if they've never seen rain before, let alone driven in it. These are also the same people who more than likely learned how to drive in the rain, took their driver's test in the rain, and regularly commute in the rain a good 265 days out of the year.
A suggestion to those of you thinking of getting married: elope. There is absoloutely nothing about planning for a wedding that could be considered enjoyable. Not even wedding dress shopping. The joy in that little event is relegated to nothingness once you start looking at the prices. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who think I'm callous and unfeeling for not gushing openly about the wonderfulness of having a wedding and getting married. These are obviously people who have not tried to plan a wedding on a budget. I'm sure once the joyful day arrives, it'll be a truly magical day. Magical and expensive, that is. Kind of like trying to buy Disneyland.
October 5
There are certain statements that I find questionable. Take, for example, the ad placed in a local classified paper: "Adorable half East German, half show German Shepherd puppies, perfect for single females looking for companion or jogging partner. Ideal family guard dogs,(the usual contact info) No Drug Dealers Please!" Now. Does any part of this strike you as odd? Yeah. Me too. Because if I were a drug dealer, the first thing I'd do would be to announce my profession. "Hi, I'm a drug dealer and I need to buy a German Shepherd to safeguard my crack." It also makes me wonder whether the person selling these dogs has had problems like this in the past. Although, really, you'd think a Glock would be a bit more useful to a drug dealer than a dog. But hey, I'm probably a sane, rational person. What would I know...

September 29
The brillance of our legal system, part I: I was talking to a State Patrol trooper the other day, and he mentioned that he'd recently had a DUI arrest thrown out in court -- for the most ludicrous of reasons. The woman facing the DUI charges claimed that she was distraught over the loss of her family members in Hurricane Katrina which led her to drink. It would have been a reasonable defense, except that her DUI arrest was in February, 2005, a good six months prior. And yet, somehow, the judge allowed the case to be thrown out on this "ESP defense." This makes even the "twinkie defense" seem plausible.

September 19
For 10 days now, I have been amongst the ranks of the gainfully employed. And as much as I hated having nothing to do, I'm beginning to remember it fondly. Sleeping in is definitely a bonus. Having time to do mundane things, like go to the bank, is pretty much a lost cause during the week. But the whole paycheck thing -- that, I can definitely deal with. My drive, however, could stand some improvement. I suspect it says something about the quality of my job if I can stand to drive an hour each way to work every day. Whether I develop a galloping case of road rage in the next month is still up in the air. The longer your drive is every day, the exponentially larger the number of morons you encounter. Driving for an hour averages about three morons per minute. Half-awake drivers are either travelling at barely above an idle, or zinging past in the right-hand lane at mach 10. And Murphy's Law generally dictates that the one person who actually wants to do the speed limit -- and I do mean exactly: not one mile per hour faster or slower -- is directly in front of you. ...generally on the way home. But my favorite driver by far is the one wielding a cell phone in one hand, a latte in the other and whose head is either buried in their purse or doing a Linda Blair impression while trying to scream at whatever miscreants are in the back seat of the minivan. Somehow, I don't remember those skills being tested on the driver's exam. Perhaps the state should revamp the test to include these basic skills.

September 1
There are certain things in life that I'm good at. Shooting a gun is not one of those things. Sure, if I practiced more frequently I might have some skill. But I still wouldn't be good at it. If I ever ended up in a situation where I actually had to shoot something smaller than a 10-by-10 inch piece of paper from a distance of more than 10 feet, I would be so screwed. And if I happened to be walking, running, kneeling or laying down, I don't even think I could hit the broad side of a barn. In a situation like that, I would have better luck taking the bullets out of the gun and throwing them at someone. Thank god someone in this house is a good shot, because I'm certainly going to be no help in an emergency. I think the only reason my significant other takes me shooting is for comic relief. After watching me shoot, pretty much anyone would look like a marksman. I even think the dog could be considered a fair shot compared to me.

August 27
So I survived the wedding dress-shopping. Two days, and it was done and over with. Ugh. There are certain things that women should be warned about before going shopping for wedding dresses. First, the damn dresses weigh about 15 pounds apiece. Trying to drag two or three of the things back to a dressing room is about as fun and easy as trying to push a semi truck uphill in the rain. Second, forget any notion you may have about being able to dress yourself. So you've been dressing yourself since you were five or six. Big deal. Try hoisting 15 pounds of overpriced satin foofy-ness over your head and finding your way out of it. Not gonna happen. Third, you don't just get to wear the dress. You get to wear the medieval-torture style corset that lifts and shapes! What joy. Personally I'm a fan of breathing and being able to bend over, but hey...really, they're not necessities. And let's just say that I don't have a whole lot that needs to be "lifted." And finally, if, like me, you want a dress that makes you appear to actually have a waist, you get to wear a fun little slip that looks like something out of the Addams family. It stands up by itself. Clothes should not do that. Ever. As it was, once I was lifted, tucked, sucked, zipped and laced into about fifty zillion dresses, the magic was gone. Granted, the magic of the occasion wasn't really there to begin with, but after an hour and a half of being dressed and undressed, I felt like bridal Barbie. Whee. The only good news is that it's alllllll over with. Thank god.

August 22
So tomorrow I have to go wedding dress-shopping. Notice I say "have to" not "get to." In the grand scheme of my life so far, the only thing I've looked forward to with more dread was when I got my wisdom teeth pulled. And at least with that experience the doctor gave me valium before the procedure to take the edge off. Oh, how I wish.... I'm gonna need a constant intravenous flow of vodka tomorrow to keep from being a heinous bitch to the poor sappy sales lady who has the misfortune to try and force-feed dresses to me. It's not that I don't want to try on dresses (oh wait...I don't want to try dresses on, silly me...), it's just that I already know what I want, and I know that I'm really really picky. (I spent a whole day in Tiffanys and couldn't find a single thing I liked...trust me...I'm picky...but at least I recognize my faults.) I also see no point in paying out the ass for a dress that's going to need hundreds of dollars more in alterations when I could just get the blasted thing made custom and save myself all the time. BUT, apparently wedding dress shopping is one of those cutesy traditions. I'm gonna try not to start a new tradition of puking on the sales-lady. Seriously. The whole wedding thing is SO much easier if you're a guy. It's just not fair. Rent a tux, show up at the right time, and they're done. Ughhh....I can't wait to have all this planning crap over and done with.

August 18
So now that I'm engaged, I get to have the unbridled joy of planning for a wedding. This is right up there on my list of fun things to do...right next to getting a root canal. Why, you ask? Shouldn't wedding planning be a magical, exciting experience? Unfortunately, it's not nearly as nifty as it sounds. First I had to pick a place to be married -- simple, right? Not quite. Apparently there are obsessive brides and parents-of-brides who pick out their wedding locations decades in advance -- for instance, when the bride is born. Silly me, I decided to find a place only a year in advance. Which means that most places are already booked up, and have been for several years. And don't forget the joy of dress shopping at huge megastores like David's Bridal -- which, I'm convinced, is the McDonalds of bridal wear. Try fighting off sappy, patronizing salespeople while wearing a $500 dress that can weigh upwards of 15 pounds. Brides should go through self-defense training for this sort or thing. And what about invitations? And a bridal registry? And choosing a photographer? And a florist? And a caterer? The only thing I'm interested in right now is choosing a bartender and a two-gallon jug of Maalox. And I get to enjoy this "magical" experience for another year. Goody.

August 4
Another item to add to the list of things that make me realize Americans are utterly and completely incompent: This morning, while pouring myself a bowl of Frosted Mini-Wheats, I noticed a warning on the side of the box. And what does this warning say?? "Contains Wheat Ingredients" Holy shit, a revelation! IT'S IN THE NAME OF THE CEREAL, PEOPLE. Sheesh. The sad part is that the warning is undoubtedly on there because some MENSA candidate with a wheat allergy poured himself a bowl of cereal without having the forethought to consider that the name of cereal includes the word "wheat," then sued the company. It's really sad when mundane things like cereal have to come with warnings. Pretty soon they're going to have to put warning labels on hot cups of coffee. Oh, wait.....

July 18
You know what I'm really really really sick of hearing? "We really appreciate you coming in for the interview, but we've decided to hire someone with a little more experience." I get more and more enraged every time I hear this phrase a couple days after I complete what, at the time, seemed to be a pleasant, promising interview. Let me tell you something, people: I CAN'T GET ANY MORE EXPERIENCE IN MY CHOSEN FIELD UNLESS SOMEONE DECIDES TO HIRE ME! It's a catch-22. I am more than capable of being an editor, a writer, a marketing copywriter and so on and so forth. I didn't go to college and get a degree by being stupid and incompetent. And I wouldn't be applying for a position unless I thought I had the capability to actually do the job. Sure, maybe I don't have all the experience in the world. But I work hard and I learn fast. Apparently no one in this county is willing to take a chance on someone with a college degree and lot of motivation and skill, but with limited experience. I can't decide whether to be incredibly depressed or incredibly peeved. The combination of the two is almost more than I can handle and stay sane. If, by some freak chance, I manage to get another interview for a job, I wonder if I'll have a hard time not yelling at the interviewer that experience doesn't always equal skill when it comes time for hiring. Ugh. I think I understand now what causes people to go on shooting rampages. Don't worry -- I wouldn't act on it. I just understand the urge.

July 12
Ahh, vacation. Such a wonderful thing -- up until you get the credit card bills for all the fun, relaxing times you had. Mine was a joy -- the actual vacation part, not so much the travel to and from. So here's a word to the wise: If you're planning an international vacation (to somewhere outside north america) please consider spending extra money for business or first class seats. Seriously. If you're going to be stuck inside a tin can for longer than seven hours, do not travel economy class. I speak from experience. My vacation this year was to Australia (14hour plane ride) and New Zealand (13 hour plane ride). And in the interest of saving what little money I don't have, I booked economy class seats. That's the nice name for them. If the airlines actually called them what they were, no one would travel back there. In actuality, "economy" class really means "cheap" class. The seats are a lot like fabric covered sardine cans with armrests. See, in first and business class, you actually have more than 10 inches of legroom. In cheap class, they pack the seats together so tightly that even Kate Moss would have a tight squeeze getting in and out. The legroom is non-existent, and trying to remove anything from the bags you've shoved under the seats in front of you is an exercise in contortionism. And the actual seats themselves were designed by the Marquis de Sade: the clamshell approach to chiropractic health. It's like trying to get comfortable inside an eggshell -- there is no way that's a comfortable position for the back. And let's not forget that the actual seat itself is nothing more than a fabric-covered holder for the flotation device down there. There is no padding on the seats in cheap class. And no matter how much free liquor you consume, you can't drown out the throbbing pain in your posterior from constant sitting. So for the sake of your health, your back and your rear end, consider business class.

June 17
Americans are getting dumber. Granted, those of us with the ability to look objectively at our society as a whole have probably noticed this trend over the years, but I think it's getting worse. Case in point: consumer purchasing trends in the auto market. During the past several years, we've been made aware by news stories and enviro-nuts that our global supplies of oil are fast being depleted. Gas prices have gone up, and car companies are finally getting off their butts and developing hybrid gas/electric cars. (Of course, the technology for electric cars has been around since the mid 1800s -- and in 1900 nearly 24% of the automobiles sold were fully electric cars -- but hey, gas was somehow a better option and all the electric car knowhow somehow lapsed over the last 150-odd years.) So naturally, a common-sense consumer in our society should consider purchasing a gas-efficient vechicle, right? Maybe not a hybrid vehicle necessarily, but perhaps something that would routinely get 28 to 35 miles per gallon, right? Of course not. Consumers today are subscribing to the big-truck-small-dick theory of consumption and purchasing vehicles that could cart around a small army with room to spare. Truck and SUV sales have skyrocketed. Naturally. We're being warned that our non-renewable oil source is getting sucked dry, so we go out and create and purchase vehicles that suck down gas faster than an alcoholic in a beer-drinking contest. We're stupid. And no offense to our fearless-but-shortsighted commander in chief, but he's not helping matters any. It makes me wonder if he actually understands what non-renewable means: limited supply. As in, once you use it, it ain't comin' back. Rather than ferreting around in our natural parks looking for the last drops of an energy source that's only going to make us more dependent on foreign nations in the future, maybe our current presidential MENSA candidate ought to be investing a little more time and energy into the research and development of sustainable energy sources and technology. Like BioDiesel. Or fuel cells. Or all those other un-federally-subsidized programs that are trying to prepare technology that can keep us from having a nation-wide meltdown when we do finally run out of oil. But then again, this kind of thinking is probably common sense. And there's no place for that in our government, now is there?

June12
I think I can actually feel my brain wasting away into nothingness. Unemployment might be fun for a little while, but I can't understand how some people can truly enjoy staying home and doing nothing. Sure, I like getting up at 10am as much as the next person. But really, what do I have to do? This is only exaserbating my procrastination. I could go grocery shopping today, but why? It's not as though I have anything to do tomorrow. I could clean the house today, but... well, you see where this is going. I think the freedom to do whatever I want is actually more restrictive. I have all the time in the world, but no motivation to actually accomplish anything. At least with work I knew I could finish the day feeling as though I'd been productive. Sure, I sometimes felt a little stressed to run errands after work and before going to bed, but hey, I at least had a purpose for getting up in the morning. Now, my purpose for getting up in the morning is the dog whining at me. I'm sure the dog is loving all the extra attention and people time, but really. I think I may go insane. Reading the paper and watching the news are two of only a few things that are keeping me from feeling like an undereducated slob. I need a job...a good one, not that cubicle-ized version of Hell that I quit.

June 6
Being as how I'm unemployed (I like to think of it as month-long hiatus from work) I've now got ample time to ponder the mysteries of life. This morning, my pondering took the form of channel surfing. It's amazing that with more than 60 channels to choose from on my current cable network, there is still not a damn thing on (besides the 24-hour news and weather channels...but who wants to watch those all the time?). What further amazes me are the things that ESPN apparently considers "sport." Take, for example, today's noon lineup. On ESPN, you've got the world's strongest man competition -- a dozen over-muscled, neanderthal-esque men bench-pressing european cars as if they were hot wheels. This I can see as a sport -- or failing that, at least some sort of justifiable athletic competition. And then there's ESPN2, the bastard child of ESPN. What are they televising?? A Scrabble competition. Seriously. Now, call me crazy, but I have yet to find anything even vaguely athletic about scrabble. Scrabble even makes curling look like a sport. I definitely don't remember a varsity Scrabble team in high school. You don't see nerdy folks at the gym pumping iron so that they can compete in international Scrabble tournaments. Now, if the brilliant minds at ESPN2 can conjure up a way to make Scrabble a bonafide athletic event, then they might have something. My suggestion is to make Scrabble into a full-contact game...something like lacrosse, perhaps...where contestants have to run around with letter squares and fling them into a net in order to score points. That would be worth watching.

June 3
It's been another couple weeks again, but I can promise that I'll be better at posting more often from now on....and ya wanna know why?? Because I quit my job today. Yay for me! It's incredibly liberating to finally be able to leave a place that drove me absoloutely nuts. Those of you who have been following my ever-so-perky comments about this new job will know what sorts of frustrations I was facing on a daily basis. Needless to say, all those frustrations built up to the point where I finally realized that I literally couldn't force myself to stay there any longer. I can put up with a lot of things, but I have a breaking point...and that was today. So I packed up my desk, walked out the door and, as I left, dropped a tactfully worded note to my now former boss, the company president, and company CEO letting them know what I thought of the position. This is what I said:
"This email is to inform you that as of this date, I am tendering my resignation as the Technical Writer at XXXX. During the month that I have spent in the position, I have discovered that neither the workload or the work fit the job description that we discussed. I have received minimal support from those people who were in positions to assist me in learning the duties of my position. I have also become aware that my position is "not a priority" according to many in the (company). I do not wish to continue working in such an environment and plan to pursue other employment. As a courtesy, I will refrain from referring to your organization as my former employer during my pursuit of employment.
As you begin your search for an appropriate person to fill this position, allow me to make a few suggestions based on my experience here.
First, if you do intend to hire another professional technical writer, please do more research into what work a technical writer is capable of doing. Review the "Technical Communication" book by Rebecca E. Burnett, visit www.stc.org or www.attw.org for more information. In addition, I suggest you more clearly define the role a technical writer will fulfill at the (company).
Second, if you do plan to hire a professional technical writer, I suggest making the position on-call, contract, or part-time. I have discovered that many of your department heads write the content for various manual sections -- an excellent idea since they are extremely familiar with their duties and are thus able to produce very comprehensive instructions and information.However, since a technical writer would not actually be doing this writing, it limits the duties he or she would be performing in a given day or week. In short, the manner in which you have organized the technical writer's duties means that there is not enough daily work to warrant a full 40 hour week.
My final suggestion to you would be to hire an administrative assistant. The type of work I performed during my tenure here was a far cry from what many would consider to be technical writing. Typing in the editing changes of others, organizing manual sections, making copies and mailing updates do not fall into the category of technical writing -- they are purely administrative duties. All the tasks that I have undertaken and completed here at the (company) are ones that could easily be accomplished by an administrative assistant.
The opportunity to work here has certainly been educational, and has helped me shape my ideas of what I see for myself in the future. I wish you the best in future endeavors."
Believe me, it took a whole lot of self-control not to say "Kiss my ass. You can take this job and shove it."

May 24
Looks like another few days since my last posting. I'd do this at work, but the stupid PC I use doesn't recognize the website, for whatever reason. Sigh. Nothing has changed in two weeks except my more rabid desire to find a new job where I get to do something more intellectually challenging than making copies and mailing things. For those of you who own businesses, or manage people: for the love of god...If you're going to create a new position, there are two things you MUST do before you hire someone to fill it. First, you gotta research the position so you know what the person you're hiring is capable of doing, and probably expects to be doing when he or she accepts the job. And second, please, make sure that there is actual work that needs to be done by a new person. What boggles my mind is that my current employers seem to think that it's going to take me 40 hours to complete 15 to 20 pages of editing changes. If I actually worked at the speed I'm used to, I could get that stuff done in about six to seven hours, max. I honestly don't know what my boss thinks I'm doing with my time back there in my cubicle in the corner. Either she has really low standards when it comes to getting work done quickly, or she has no idea how quickly I'm capable of working. And what's worse, even if she did know how fast I can work, there still wouldn't be enough work on a daily basis to keep me busy for a full eight hours each day. There's just not that much that needs to be done. It's just maddening to know that everyone considers you useful except yourself. Things like that can drive a person nuts. Believe me. I know.

May 16
Okay, so it's been a couple weeks. This is what happens when you take a new job. And by job, I don't mean actual work. Sadly, I was led to believe that my new position would actually require me to utilize the skills I learned in college ... the academic ones. As of right now, I'm utilizing the non-academic skills I learned -- skills like finding hours of amusement in online games like battleship and darts and blackjack. Skills like being able to prop my chin up on my hands and sleep, while still looking like I'm working at my computer. And skills like stretching out miniscule amounts of work into hours and hourse of labor just so I feel as though I have something productive to do. Unfortunately, this new job isn't living up to the expectations my new boss set for me in the job interview and pre-acceptance phone call and question period. I'm basically getting half again as much money as my last job for doing about, oh, five to six real hours of "work" a week. And as much as I love getting an essentially "free" paycheck, it's absoloutely maddening to have spent four years in college getting a degree that I honestly have yet to use. Quite frankly, the most productive hour of my day is lunch. Because I actually accomplish something. It's sad. Hopefully there's another job waiting for me out there ... soon ... before I run out of things to occupy my boredom.

May 4
More things that make me wonder. Take, for example, the commercial for 'Ambien.' It's a drug that helps people sleep. And yet, people are warned that one of the side effects is drowsiness. Well I would hope so. I highly doubt that people are taking it to stay awake. And I would sincerely hope that people taking this drug would realize that it should make them sleepy. But hey, we live in a country where we have to put warning labels on everything, including steaming hot cups of coffee, because people are too stupid to actually understand what's going on in the world around them. It's equally sad that stupid people actually sue big companies over accidents that only emphasize their own stupidity. If you accidentally spill scalding coffee on yourself, or decide to stick your hand in a wood chipper despite warnings not to, or use your hair dryer in the shower despite warnings of electrical shock, I say you ought to be taken to the hospital, then berated for your idiocy, not given money so you can go out and do the same thing again. There's no learning experience here. Imagine if school children could sue teachers for "allowing" them to eat glue or crayons, even if it is entirely the child's decision to do so despite repeated warnings to the contrary. It's ridiculous. People need to learn to suck it up and deal with their stupidity, they need to learn to read (and follow) instructions, and they need to stop sueing large companies over accidents that result from a diminished mental capacity.

April 28
So I realized yesterday evening, as the dog was romping in the park with some doggy buddies, that she's definitely not a retriever. Maybe it's because she's still a puppy. Maybe it's because she's kinda ADD and gets distracted by everything. Or maybe it's because she's a herding dog and therefore was bred to chase things but not actually bring them back. Either way, I was watching the way she played with some amusement.
Most dogs will chase a frisbee or a ball when it's thrown. My dog is no exception. However, once the toy lands -- or nears the ground -- most dogs will snap it up and bring it back, thereby allowing it to be thrown again. My dog is not this bright. She'll chase it, sure. All they way to where it lands. Then she'll sniff it, lick it, paw at it and, once she's sure it's not going to move, comes trotting back as if to say, "Okay, it's not going anywhere. Now what?" If I throw a frisbee for her and another dog, she won't actually chase the toy, she'll chase the dog. She'll race the dog to the toy, make sure he picks it up, then herd him back toward me. And if he's not going fast enough, or straight enough (or whatever it is she thinks he's not doing) she'll nip him in the butt or bounce up and outright body-slam him. Apparently this is more entertaining than actually retrieving a ball. Well, at least it's more entertaining for me. I'm not sure what the other dogs think.

April 26
The sun is shining, the birds are chirping ... and I'm inside. At work. With no windows anywhere near me. And I'm looking at the clock wondering how long it's going to take before I get to go home and enjoy my life. It's really pathetic that we're forced to work through what may be the best days of our lives, only to look back in 40 years, when our bodies are old and can't do anything fun anymore without the aid of Depends and a truss, and realize that we missed out on actually enjoying our youth. I think work should run on the same schedule as schools. Work through the fall, winter and spring, and then take the summer off so that everyone can enjoy the warm weather and long days. There's entirely too much pressure put on people to work 40+ hours a week in order to be deemed successful. Granted, work can be fun. But it's still work. And we're going to work ourselves to death and wonder why everyone is depressed, or chemically imbalanced, or prone to bouts of violence, or stressed to the point of developing ulcers. Abolish work in the summer! Go out and enjoy living life! Regress to a childlike state of blissful ignorance! It'll probably be good for you!

April 25
Stress is a funny thing. Everyone handles it differently. Some take nice, deep breaths and realize that everything will sort itself out. Some take long walks to relax. I am not one of those people. I probably should be, if only for the sake of my raw nerves and developing ulcer. I handle stress by developing a nervous eye tic, getting cranky when people hand things to me THREE DAYS past a deadline and expect me to "fit them in" to a special section that I've already FINISHED, muttering incoherent curses under my breath and generally absorbing any and all stress in the immediate area. Because no matter how well I do my job, if something doesn't get done on time -- whether it's my fault or not -- it automatically becomes my fault. Hi, I'm the scapegoat. Nice to meet you. Somehow, during situations like this, long walks and deep breaths don't really cut it when it comes to diffusing stress. A punching bag and a shotgun, however...now those might work.

April 20
There are probably many things in this world that can drive a person nuts. For me, a moment of insanity can be induced by random capitalization. For some unknown reason, there are people in this world -- normal, English-speaking-since-birth people -- who feel the need to captialize phrases like "good job" or "very important" in the middle of a sentence. And when I read sentences like "We told Amy that it was Very Important that she remember to tell contestants Good Job when they leave the stage," I have the urge to run screaming from the building, find the person who wrote that sentence, and remind them that we are not German and don't indulge in mid-sentence capitalization of phrases. It's just not normal. You can't read that sentence without stuttering over the capitals. There's no need! That's why boldface type, italics, hell even quote marks were invented! Perhaps these people think they're being "cute" or have found a unique way to make something stand out. Or perhaps they need to return to basic English classes for a refresher course on when we do and don't capitalize things.

April 14
With all the restrictions they put on what you can and can't take on board an airplane, I'm surprised they even let people on anymore. Since they've banned lighters (as of today, strangely...), fingernail clippers, nail files, paperclips, staples and anything else that could possibly be used --in a pinch -- to commit some sort of horrible crime, I don't see why people aren't next on the list. Think about it. I mean, fingernail clippers themselves aren't dangerous. Neither are lighters. But in the hands of the criminally-minded, well, you get the idea. Not that I'm condoning any sort of violence on an airplane (although if I did it would definitely be directed toward obnoxious passengers or high-strung flight attendants) but think about it -- how long would it possibly take to kill someone with a pair of fingernail clippers? You can't very easily clip someone to death. Hell, sometimes I can't even clip my fingernails properly and that's what the damn clippers are designed for. And the teensy-weensy little nail file on the clippers is about an inch long, blunt, and almost impossible to use even when just cleaning one's nails. Imagine trying to stab someone with that thing. Honestly. You'd have more luck trying to impale someone with those annoying little plastic spork things they give you to eat with. And what about the blankets? Suitable for hanging, perhaps? What's worse, the flight attendants give you aluminum cans and glass bottles! Anyone who's ever seen a bar fight should know that those can be effective weapons ... maybe not for taking over a plane, but definitely for causing some serious mayhem. I think all passengers should be forced to undergo a psych test before even being allowed to board the plane. And then, once on board, they should be placed in straitjackets and velcroed to a seat. That'd definitely solve some problems.

April 12
The tiny town of Story, Indiana, has conducted a contest over the years that I think more cities should pick up on: naming a "village idiot."
Ever since the advent of political correctness and all the warm-and-fuzzy people who think that any sort of public punishment or humiliation is the most abominable thing in the world, cities have been loath to actually insult people. Hence, the rise in violent crime. As many of us know, empty threats are about as effective as an unloaded gun. The naming of a village idiot, however, would definitely be a step in the right direction. Why, you ask? Well, what better way to convince the feeble- and criminally-minded to cease and desist their idiotic behaviour than by blatantly proclaiming their acts of stupidity to the masses? People, sadly, are sheep. And when the lone sheep realizes that he or she has fallen out of favor with the rest of the herd (through stupid acts such as, say, stapling one's hand to a two-by-four or driving into a ditch while talking on a cell phone, applying makeup and drinking coffee all at the same time) that lone sheep will do one of two things: make amends to fit in with the rest of the herd, or run itself off the edge of a cliff. Either way, it seems to solve the problem. Callous? Probably. But I think it's nigh-on time that we stopped sugar-coating reality. No wonder the latest generation of kids are such petulant, whiny ingrates. Perhaps if we made it clear that the world isn't exactly as happy-go-lucky as it's portrayed on MTV and the WB, then these kids might actually take a stab at succeeding in the world -- rather than just complaining about it.
And then we come to water. Yes, water. While I understand that the federal regs mandate putting nutrition information on everything we eat or drink, is it really necessary to paste a "Nutrition Facts" label on water? Calories? Nope. Sodium? Nope. Cholesterol? Unless there's something really fishy going on, nope. And what's with the serving sizes? A 20-ounce bottle of water contains 2.5 8oz servings. Of nothing. So it's not as though we'll go over our daily calorie count by drinking the whole bottle. And as for the Aquafina claim "Perfect taste" I defy anyone to describe what a perfect abcense of taste tastes like. It tastes like nothing. But how do we know it's a perfect taste of nothingness? Can you compare nothing to nothing? I mean, you can't do it in math or science, but apparently Aquafina can. Must be some sort of great breakthrough.

April 11
I'm a "Desperate Housewives" addict (yes, yes, smutty television -- but so entertaining) and there's been recent press -- like during last night's show -- about some catfighting that went on between a few of the actresses during a Vanity Fair photo shoot. Catfighting over clothing. And attention. And it got me thinking. For the 95 percent of us in this world who aren't ridiculously rich and famous, catfighting like this seems really ridiculous. At what point do you stop being grateful for the opportunities you have? At what point do you become so materialistic, ungrateful and demanding that you begin ripping others to shreds over who gets to wear the "best" thousand-dollar-vintage swimsuit on the cover of a magazine? We should all be so lucky to get an opportunity like that. I know fame can be a powerful thing, but how do you get to a point where you lose all sense of common decency and respect? What does it take for someone to completely lose their sense of what's real? And how can it take only tabloid scrutiny for the rich and famous to realize how petty and ridiculous their complaints really are?
There are certain sounds that you can enjoy waking up to -- birds chirping, someone whispering softly in your ear, the quiet sounds of a good song on the radio.
Being roused out of sleep at 2:30 in the morning by the hiccuping noises of the dog voiding her stomach contents onto the carpet in the hallway just outside your door is definitely NOT a sound I enjoy waking up to. Nor do I enjoy wandering, blearily-eyed, around the bathroom trying to find enough toilet paper to wipe up a salad plate-sized puddle of runny yellow goo. Fortunately, there was no accompanying vomitous stench. However, it was rather hard to go back to sleep when the much-relieved dog felt obliged to wiggle and wag her way enthusiastically around my feet. I also didn't appreciate her valiant efforts to lick my hands and face with her recently vomit-soaked tongue. Thank goodness for dog crates and bedroom doors.

April 5
Some days you wake up, go to work, and just KNOW, all day, that you should have stayed in bed. It's raining, cold, and you're stuck behind drivers that for some perverse reason choose to drive 15 miles per hour beneath the speed limit. And then at work the hours seem to drag by at an impossibly slow speed making you wonder whether the rotation of the earth has actually slowed down -- but since you're in the back of an office with about 10 walls between you and a window, you'd never know. And no matter how you sit in your desk chair (backwards, sideways, upside down or with your feet up on your army-green World War two-era desk) your back won't stop hurting. And the pictures on your wall refuse to stay there, even after several applications of scotch tape and mild obscenities. And what's worse, the end of your day depends solely on when someone else gets his lazy ass in gear to get you the work that you have to proofread before you can leave -- and he's already an hour late. Mix me a drink and book me a flight to Cabo. Please.

April 4:
So here's a delicious bit of irony: the Irish are betting on who will be the next pope. Literally. They have odds and everything. Apparently the top two contenders, both of whom have 11-4 odds, are from Italy and Nigeria. Also an interesting combination. Some guy bet $1,300 on it! Last time I checked, there was definitely a passage in the bible that frowned upon gambling. I'm guessing that gambing on who will be the next pope is pretty much an express ticket to Hell. Not that I'm religously minded, but honestly, people. The only thing I could think of that would be worse would be betting on when the next pope will die. People definitely need more constructive outlets for those moments of boredom. I can't imagine what would drive someone to think "Hey, let's bet on who's going to be the next pope!" ...although I can hazard a guess. Guinness. "Brilliant!" Okay, maybe not.
And speaking of dying. As much as I understand respecting and honoring the passing of a world leader and religous figure, DEAR GOD. Could the media possibly spend any more time obcessing over the intimate details of the pope's funeral, et al? "Continuous coverage of the pope's death." News flash, people. He's already dead. As in past-tense. As in, he's not currently in the throes of dying and we don't need up-to-the-minute details on how it's proceeding. There must be more relevant news happening somewhere. Fires, shootings, corrupt politicians -- the stuff we're used to. The media really has a field day when it comes to covering the death of famous people. I think at this point they may be crossing the line from honoring the dead to cheapening the whole ritual. Really, a week straight of documentaries, memorials, photo montages, video montages, live feed of some Catholic person weeping in the Vatican City -- it's a bit much. Honor and respect is one thing. Spectacle and media ratings are entirely another. Just let it go, people. Let it go.
Holy cow, it's getting worse. I give you the Seattle Times headline "Pope on display in St. Peter's Basilica." Seriously. Someone else has got to see the humour here. What is he, a travelling art exhibit? A Monet can go on display. A Van Gogh can be put on display. Hell, a Rodin sculpture can be put on display. But the POPE? Are you kidding me?? Did they frame him and stick him on the wall? How in hell (pardon the ironic religious undertones) do you put a person on display? As a person myself, I honestly can't remember a time when I've been "on display." I know I've made an idiotic display of myself in public, and I know I've displayed emotion in public, but I've never displayed myself. And I highly doubt I ever will. I mean, unless someone sculpts me and displays me in public (which is also highly unlikely). Something about a person being "on display" (and the corresponding visual image) is just so completely wrong that it's funny. "Pope placed at St. Peter's Basilica for viewing" would be SO much better...still accurate and wouldn't evoke the feeling amongst people that the Pope is being treated like a damn museum exhibit.


April 2:
This whole daylight savings time thing is a gigantic pain in the ass. Now I gotta go find all the clocks in my house and set them ahead an hour. And then I'll probably forget to set the clock in my car ahead and I'll be early to work. Or late. Or however this damn thing works. I still don't understand why we need daylight savings time during a season when it's light more than 12 hours a day. Maybe if the daylight savings kicked in around, say, October, when it's dark for about 18 hours a day, I'd be happier. Meanwhile, the cable companies must be completely cracked out by the whole time change because the listings have been so jacked up all day that it's nearly impossible to figure out what's on when. Half the channels are right, half the channels are an hour ahead of themselves. And they switch, randomly, throughout the day. I say it's more proof that Comcast really is the antichrist, but that might be going a bit far. Nah. Maybe not.


April 1:
Blogging is under construction. Hopefully not for long. As soon as I finish having my social life for the evening, I'm sure I'll have something caustically witty to say.
Yup. April 1 was definitely the best day to start a site. Perhaps if I had some vague clue what I was doing when setting up a site amidst all the technical mumbo-jumbo, that might help. Oh well. At least I recognize my weaknesses.